Simply State Absolutely no To some National Gun Registry.

I was having a discussion with a friend today who, although very liberal on most issues, is somewhat middle of the road in regards to gun control. He is not against concealed carry, but does favor a lot more background checks – especially on sales from an exclusive individual to private individual.

He is a little surprised that I am against this. “Why?”, he asked.

First, let me preface my reasoning with a little information regarding me. I am not an anarchist. I am not really a doomsday prepper. I don’t believe we’re due for a revolution, certainly not within my lifetime. I like having SOME government (don’t tell my anti-statist friends though). Most of these beliefs being so, I must admit that I do fear for the generations which come after my death (I do hope to own at least another 40 years, which may get me into my 80s).

So back once again to my friend. Why do I disagree with him? Well, it is simple. STI pistols for sale Background checks on every sale, specifically private individual to private individual, would result in a nationwide gun registry. I am greatly against having certainly one of these.

My friend countered, very proudly I would add, that people must register our cars. Why don’t you our guns? This is simple. Nowhere in the constitution does it guarantee the best to keep and own cars. Most of us caved on the licensing of cars and drivers in regards to a century ago.

Our founding fathers specifically put verbiage in the constitution allowing us to keep and bear arms. There are different interpretations in regards to what they meant, but I think at least part of these reasoning was so that people could protect ourselves from a tyrannical government or those that wish to accomplish us harm.

Do I think that our government is tyrannical? Well, not quite yet. We’re still the most free nation on earth. I do not like to path our country is on, but I don’t feel it is to late to right the ship.

Having a national gun registry would result in forced gun buy-backs as well as confiscation during some future crisis (either natural or man-made). Having our abilities to protect ourselves from criminals and/or government listed in a database will be sharing information that is much too personal.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Government is proficient at making us believe that being safer (their definition) is well worth stopping a couple of rights. Forcing people everywhere to register their private, constitutionally protected guns is a bad idea.

I can foresee that guns would even get linked with addresses where their owners no further live. What if you moved right into a home where the last occupants had several guns registered and the police came searching for those folks? Most of us realize that police, most of them being great people, do make mistakes when their adrenaline levels are too high. Would you want your home getting shot up because the last residents had guns listed in the registry?

Throughout a so-called “state of emergency” you are able to bet some local, state or national governments will make a proceed to take any weapons that did not reside in the hands of government personnel. It has recently happened. Begin to see the video below.

I still find it none of the government’s business if I own a rifle (or guns). Yes, I have to do the exact same background check as someone else when I buy a new gun. But do you consider that having a national registry would keep guns out of the hands of individuals who couldn’t pass a background check? Not a chance. I think you’d see plenty of gun owners reporting their guns stolen in order to sell their guns to whomever they desire – in the same way they could now.

When times get bad, whose doors are agents of the government (police or military ) planning to be knocking down when they go on their gun collection binges? I’ll inform you – the door’s which are on the addresses within the gun registry.

While we don’t currently have a government that kicks in doors and gives gas showers or firing squads to people they cannot like, we don’t know what our government will appear like in 50 or 100 years. I’d like my children and grandchildren to manage to defend themselves from both a tyrannical government or a homicidal maniac (I suppose they may be one and the exact same though).

Starting a national gun registry is the first faltering step to taking guns from people the government does not need possessing guns. Currently these people are felons and those with mental problems. Who might these future gunless people be? Individuals of particular political parties? Individuals of certain economic classes? Individuals of certain religions? It has all happened throughout world history. We pretend to function as the enlightened Americans but we’ve factions that want to take all our freedoms and give all the ability to the government the same as dictators of past and present we’ve all heard of.

How does this happen? We’ve to consider it from two avenues. First the gradual lack of gun rights for anyone through new “minor” restrictive gun laws. Second, the entire lack of gun rights for specific sets of people the government has targeted. Imagine a candle burning at both ends. As you end burns, more and more of the governments enemies are specifically forbidden to own guns. As the other end burns, more and more of the general population are becoming the remaining of these gun rights recinded as well. When the flames meet in the middle we’re left without guns for anybody, and we’ve a government with nothing to fear. That is the nightmare of the slippery slope.

Leave a Reply